Imagine for a moment that the human race accepted everything we knew of medicine 70 years after Galen lived as gospel truth, and never developed medicine as a science, because surely, in 70 years, we knew all we ever needed to know. We wouldn’t even have gotten to the glorious “leeches” phase! And where would we be had the barbers of olde hadn’t cured our demonic possessions or imbalanced humors or excesses of bile with a good bloodletting?
In 2009, it will have been (nice English, LUTEM) 70 years since the death of Sigmund Freud, who formed the basis of psychiatry by gathering data on the shit-eating, mother-fucking tendencies of residents of insane asylums, and then telling the world that every personality is formed around our defecation schedules, and our sexual feelings about our parents.
Because, if it’s true for that guy who draws on the walls with poop and decorates the floor by pissing rune-shapes into caked-up vomit, it’s true for the most repressed Elizabethan school-marm, or the baseball player who has his world records revoked because all his bat-swinging was based on roid rage, or your average Joe or Jane, living his or her life shaded by the Elm Streets of suburban anonymity!
That’s right. Next year, we set sail on another 70-year journey during which we just might find out if a cigar can ever be JUST a cigar. Here’s hopin’!
What I’m trying to say is, it is entirely too common, and is entirely too disturbing that people, especially in Anglicized countries like England (ha!) and the US and Canada, are all too willing to accept the word of psychologists and psychiatrists as gospel truth. Yes, there are myriad differences between psychologists and psychiatrists. For the sake of this blog-posting, though, they will be ignored, as they are irrelevant. They both claim to be experts in their field, and what I’m trying to say is, there is no such thing as an expert on the human mind. There are people who have studied the human mind longer than other people have, but that is a far cry from “expertise,” or even “a tip of the iceberg.” To mix yet another metaphor, the science of psychiatry has yet to merely scratch the surface of the subject.
Anyone can conduct a study and publish it. Polish the frame and hang it high, boys! It’s as simple as this: if you don’t understand the beast you are studying, you are not an expert, and whatever you have to say about the subject is entirely irrelevant.
Example:
I could travel to Egypt and give a rectal examination to a camel. I could write my findings in beautiful penmanship. I could maybe even make some graphs and diagrams and label them. I could submit my findings to the leading journal on Dromedary Proctology, and they might very well publish. I could crown myself the Queen of Camel Constipation Relief and maybe get Bono to play an awareness-raising concert under the gaze off the Great Sphynx. I could put my face and name all over television advertising for laxatives, citing my recent studies.
That sounds pretty neat, doesn’t it? There are a LOT of problems with that scenario, not the least of which is I don’t know the first thing about camels, other than the basics, and that their toes are not good fashion role models. I make myself look like an expert, and since I have had my hands up the asses of so many camels, people are willing to believe me.
People who practice and believe in things like psychoanalysis and talk therapy are experts on the human brain as much as I am an expert on the asses of camels. I can look at the ass of a camel from all different angles and think about camel’s asses from all different perspectives. Hell, I can even reach in and pull out a big fat turd every once in a while. But that doesn’t necessarily help the camel.
Any assertions made by psychologists or psychiatrists or even unlicensed “counselors” are just as ludicrous. They can listen to you talk, inform you about tough love, send you to AA meetings, try to get you to think in a goal-oriented manner. Sure, those things might be beneficial, but you can get that same advice from talk radio hosts. They will charge you up one end and out the other, and maybe eve pull up a real turd from your past every once in a while, but talking about it doesn’t necessarily help the camel, if you catch my drift.
I’m sick and tired of mental health workers thinking they are experts, and that everything they say is fact. If that were true, wouldn’t the world be a nice place to live? There would be no blindness, no scizophrenia, no Alzheimer’s, no neurological decay, no strokes, no neuro-vascular disorders of any kind. There would be no learning disabilities, no cerebro-spinal degradation, no multiple sclerosis, no cerebral palsy…hell, no palsy of ANY kind!
But no. We just don’t know enough about the human mind yet. The science is only in its infancy, and nobody has any right to make claims of having even SOME of the answers. Because nobody does. There has been some progress, but not nearly enough to get excited about.
Some doctors still prescribe electro-shock therapy. And some patients still GET electro-shock therapy.
When it comes to psychology and psychiatry, we are not even into the stone age. We’re more at the “water good, fire bad” stage. I’m pretty sure we don’t know that meat is better for us when it’s cooked.
The quacks in the mental health profession haven’t affected me personally, but I could cite several cases (anecdotal evidence, which is why I don’t present it here-I understand that anecdotal evidence is not a logical or effective way to make an argument) in which trust in them has been fatal. And if I, being only one person in a small corner of the world, know that many people who have died as a direct result of advice from these “experts,” there have to be some numbers out there to support this argument. I just haven’t found them yet.
Here are some numbers about suicide (the 11th leading cause of death in the USA, and THE MOST preventable cause of death anywhere):
According to the Centers for Disease Control, as recently as 2005, there were 32,000 deaths by suicide in the US. To break it down, that’s a person deciding to fucking DIE rather than live another day on this planet every 16 minutes. That’s less than the length of the average sitcom, minus commercials. So just about the time Homer realizes MAYBE he was wrong, your sister could have strung herself up in her garage for her 9 year-old daughter to discover when she gets back from trick-or-treating.
The military is doing a stellar job taking care of their own. In 2007, suicides among veterans increased by 20%. In one year, that’s 2,200 people, or two suburban Seattle high schools FULL of young men and women who couldn’t make it another day.
Why aren’t there standardized treatments in place for suicides? It isn’t because the government or the medical community have decided suicides shouldn’t have the right to live. It’s because each and every case is different, and as of yet, there are no means in place to evaluate each and every situation.
As of yet.
Because while mental health workers and social workers don’t have the tools to deal with this situation. Why not? It’s simple. There is just so little known about the human mind, nobody has a clue what those tools would be.
EDIT
***Although this article uses very little usable statistics, it’s on the right track, and backs up what I’m saying about talk therapy. I didn’t know it existed, but I found it on a blog I read regularly. How very fortuitous!
When talk therapy hurts.
***